LS9’s Genetics Breakthrough: Will it Produce Biofuels at Scale?

A genetic discovery could allow LS9 to produce biofuels by converting sugar directly to alkanes and fuels.

LS9’s Genetics Breakthrough: Will it Produce Biofuels at Scale?

Biofuels startup LS9 just announced a breakthrough that could lower the cost of producing “drop‐in” hydrocarbon biofuels that are low‐carbon and compatible with the existing fuel distribution infrastructure.    

In the article “Microbial Biosynthesis of Alkanes,” a team of LS9 scientists identified genes that, when expressed in E. coli, produce alkanes, the hydrocarbons that make up gasoline, diesel and jet fuel.  This discovery is the first description of the genes responsible for alkane biosynthesis and the first example of a single step conversion of sugar to fuel‐grade alkanes by a "designer" microorganism, according to the company.

For decades scientists have attempted to identify the genes that allow certain natural organisms to directly convert biomass into alkanes. To solve this mystery, the LS9 team looked into the genomes of bacteria that produce alkanes in nature -- cyanobacteria, also known as blue-green algae. “We evaluated many cyanobacteria that made alkanes and identified one that was not capable of producing them. By comparing the genome sequences of the producing and non‐producing organisms, we were able to identify the responsible genes,” according to Andreas Schirmer, Associate Director of Metabolic Engineering at LS9.

LS9 has focused on developing renewable petroleum products using a one‐step fermentation process that reduces cost and energy inputs.  Proposed biological routes to hydrocarbon production are emerging but require costly and energy-intense chemical conversion technologies such as distillation or hydrogenation. LS9’s discovery could mean the direct conversion of renewable biomass into fuels and chemicals without the need for chemical conversion technologies.

“This is a one-step sugar‐to‐diesel process that does not require elevated temperatures, high pressures, toxic inorganic catalysts, hydrogen or complex unit operations,” said Steve del Cardayre, LS9's VP of R&D. 

In addition to alkanes, LS9 is scaling up its production of a biodiesel product and a range of chemicals used in making industrial and consumer products.

The company claims that its synthetic fuels achieve 85 percent reduction of GHGs over a comparable gallon of petroleum-based diesel. 

The company’s lead product is an alkane diesel of 8 to 20 carbons, which has already achieved ASTM approval.   LS9 is also exploring the production of jet fuel.  In the long term, the company seeks to produce low-volume, high-value specialty chemicals, traditionally made from petroleum. In May 2009, LS9 announced a strategic partnership with Proctor and Gamble to develop bio-chemicals for the consumer goods giant.

LS9-biofuel-process

LS9 was founded in 2005 and has received more than $45 million in funding from Chevron Technology Ventures, Flagship Ventures, Khosla Ventures, and Lightspeed Venture Partners.  The company recently purchased a demonstration-scale facility for $2 million in Okeechobee, FL.

In addition to LS9, many next-generation biofuel firms such as Algenol, Amyris, Aurora, Cobalt, Codexis, Gevo, Joule, Qteros, Sappire Energy, Solazyme, Synthetic Genomics, Terrabon, UOP, and Virent are looking to coax fuels from bacteria, algae or by other means.   LS9, like Algenol, is looking for a direct mechanism from sugar to biodiesel or ethanol.

The enormous and looming challenge facing all of these companies, of which none have actually gotten far enough with the research process to confront, is the riddle of scaling up to the massive requirements of the liquid fuel market and getting the costs down to achieve pump parity.  Without those two business achievements and the necessary capital, all of these firms remain noble science experiments.

More details on next generation biofuels from Greentech Media Research and the report: Third and Fourth Generation Biofuels: Technologies, Markets and Economics Through 2015.

6 Comments

  • glenn2ns 07/29/10 3:24 PM

    Very interested to see how this algae development pans out.  market cost?? Are we talking about “B100”?

    Reply
  • greensolutions 07/29/10 9:19 PM

    ...and this will be renewable fuel as soon as we stop using fossil fuels to produce the sugar.

    Reply
  • SolarThink 07/30/10 7:54 AM

    People, forget about comparing to fossil fuels. They are history very soon and will start declining this century. The only thing of long-term consequence is the EROI. How much and of what type of energy is needed to produce the desired fuels. If you can make it using only the produced liquid fuel and solar energy, for example, the EROI is reasonable and it can be scaled then we have a winner.

    As soon as we realize how idiotic we are for comparing to fossil fuels (that are highly subsidized anyway) the faster we will progress. Forget mother’s milk, it’s time to grow up because she is going to run dry sooner than we think. It’s just an old way of thinking that needs a jolt of reality.

    Reply
      • Eric 08/18/10 7:57 AM

        SolarThink, I totally appreciate your POV. It would seem logical that the E in your EROI should be a major cost consideration when comparing the existing methods & feedstocks for producing fuels and chemicals. However, the major oil companies are a major lobby and heavily invested in oil exploration and refining. They will do whatever they have to do to block alternatives. I started one of the first companies in the world producing chemicals and plastics from renewable feedstocks. I started this company back in the mid 90s when there was very little commercial and consumer interest in Green due to the low cost of crude oil and a lack of public education. This company has become quite successful but our focus was only on high value chemicals and plastics. It was never on fuel. I firmly believe that the probability of success is much higher when an alternative producer focuses on higher value products initially as opposed to a pursuit of a low value, commodity product. The oil companies depend on gasoline to drive their economies of their petrochemical plants and will fight to the death to ensure that they maintain their market. As a consequence, we have seem most biomass to ethanol and algal technology companies either go out of business, delay plans to scale, or dilute their early investors to a trivial equity interest. The VCs love to push for these very high risk/high payoff business models but unfortunately all these failures damage the credibility of the entire alternatives industry. Again, I appreciate your optimism.

  • alfre 07/30/10 2:22 PM

    fascinating and full of promise, just like pregnancy…. side note, why does it seem people can’t spell Procter & Gamble right?

    Reply
  • Hemant Kumar Dubey 07/31/10 3:08 AM

    Informative and interesting article on bio-fuels. Lower imission of green house gases from these type of bio-fuels is welcome.

    Hemant Kumar Dubey
    http://www.hemantdubey.oom

    Reply
Need an avatar? Get one here: Gravatar